OFP Funding: Choose the Model Row Before Comparing a Rule
OFP Funding's public model-comparison page separates Instant Lite, Instant Classic and Instant Plus. The selected table, reviewed 24 October 2026, does not give one universal rule set for every account. This guide provides a small worksheet for retaining the exact row and variant behind a number.
Continue with this site's separate research worksheet
The selected comparison contains different conditions
The help page dated 23 September 2026 labels Lite with a 28-day maximum and monthly payouts, while Classic and Plus have unlimited maximum days and payouts labelled biweekly. It also assigns different minimum-day and consistency fields to the named models.
Those are fields in the reviewed three-model table, not an exhaustive catalogue or a personal account determination. Do not extend them to an unreviewed programme with another name, a special offer or a historical account version.
A range is not permission to choose an average
The selected table displays alternative daily and overall drawdown percentages for some models. If a field says 3% or 5%, writing 4% because it sits between them invents a condition. The appropriate value depends on the actual selected variant and its governing rules.
For an original worksheet, save four fields together: model, variant, quoted percentage and calculation reference. A percentage without its reference amount is incomplete. An illustration based on an arbitrary starting balance cannot establish how an actual provider computes equity or a daily reset.
| Record | Keep with it | Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Model name | Lite, Classic or Plus as selected | One blended OFP rule set |
| Variant percentage | The actual quoted choice | Averaging 3% and 5% into 4% |
| Loss calculation | Applicable reference and definition | A percentage without a base |
| Reward conditions | Threshold, days and schedule separately | No target means unconditional payment |
No evaluation target and reward eligibility are different questions
The reviewed table lists a minimum-withdrawal field alongside trading-day requirements and a payout schedule. Its surrounding description of a model as having no target should not be silently rewritten as a right to request any reward at any time.
Keep entry requirements, loss limits, withdrawal conditions and schedule on separate lines. The word biweekly is preserved as the provider's label here; the selected table alone is not a complete processing-time agreement. No withdrawal, account or exact checkout quote was tested.
A comparison should preserve the unfilled fields
Before comparing programmes, mark which field is missing rather than borrowing an attractive value from a different row. A Singapore locale or a familiar currency does not establish account acceptance, a local service or an exemption from the selected programme's terms.
The optional HashHedge invitation is a different programme. An OFP model name, rate, schedule or reward condition does not transfer through that link. Review the destination's current conditions before making a registration decision.
Sources and rule dates
- OFP Help Center: selected three-model comparison
Checked 2026-10-24. Named Lite/Classic/Plus fields, table dated23September2026; not other programmes, all contract conditions or personal eligibility.